Tipping the Balance

September 16th, 2011

Press, Update

When Nathan began seri­ously think­ing about Modernist Cuisine, he was adamant about one aspect of the recipes: they would all be mea­sured by weight. At The Cooking Lab, we believe that pre­cise mea­sur­ing by weight is the only way to ensure a dish turns out accu­rately every time.

The other day, Farhad Manjoo pub­lished an article–almost a plea, really–in The New York Times advo­cat­ing for more cooks and cook­books to toss their cups and spoons and use kitchen scales instead.

While he doesn’t men­tion hydro­col­loids, or other Modernist ingre­di­ents that can change a recipe if off by just 0.1 gram, he does give this anec­dote in defense of scales:

J. Kenji Lopez-Alt, the man­ag­ing edi­tor of the blog Serious Eats, once asked 10 peo­ple to mea­sure a cup of all-purpose flour into a bowl. When the cooks were done, Mr. Lopez-Alt weighed each bowl. “Depending on how strong you are or your scoop­ing method, I found that a ‘cup of flour’ could be any­where from 4 to 6 ounces,” he said. That’s a sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ence: one cook might be mak­ing a cake with one-and-a-half times as much flour as another.

We ran into the same prob­lem dur­ing the pro­duc­tion of MC when we wanted to give a table of aver­age vol­ume mea­sure­ments for peo­ple who did not own a scale. Yet despite all of our efforts, it is impos­si­ble when work­ing with solid ingre­di­ents to con­sis­tently obtain a given num­ber of grams sim­ply by mea­sur­ing the vol­ume. The ingre­di­ent dimen­sions, the force with which you fill the mea­sure, and the nat­ural shifts in water and solid con­tent all con­tribute to incon­sis­tent mea­sure­ments; there just isn’t any prac­ti­cal way to repli­cate these fac­tors every time.

Manjoo explains why we don’t see many recipes giv­ing quan­ti­ties in grams or ounces, despite all of the evi­dence that every­thing from car­rots to hydro­col­loids needs to be mea­sured by weight:

Yet the scale has failed to become a must-have tool in American kitchens. Cook’s Illustrated mag­a­zine said scales were in the kitchens of only a third of its read­ers, and they’re a fairly com­mit­ted group of cooks.

There’s a sim­ple rea­son for this: The scale doesn’t show up in most pub­lished recipes. American cook­books, other than bak­ing books, and mag­a­zines and news­pa­pers gen­er­ally spec­ify only cup and spoon mea­sure­ments for ingre­di­ents. A few, like Cook’s Illustrated, offer weights for bak­ing recipes, but not for savory cook­ing. (The Times Dining sec­tion recently began using weight mea­sure­ments with bak­ing recipes.)

This cre­ates a chicken-and-egg prob­lem for the kitchen scale. Cooks don’t own scales because recipes don’t call for one, and recipes don’t call for one because cooks don’t own one.

Many peo­ple argue that they pre­fer to cook by feel: they don’t mea­sure because they don’t need to. But they are mak­ing recipes that they know, and they have acquired a sense of taste and con­fi­dence in the kitchen through a sig­nif­i­cant period of trial and error. The truth is pro­fes­sional chefs, bak­ers, and pas­try artists often do things by feel, too, but only because they have gained such a breadth of expe­ri­ence beforehand.

Because we wrote our book to teach peo­ple and to empower them with accu­rate infor­ma­tion, we saw it as fun­da­men­tally impor­tant to give them the pre­ci­sion of a weight for every ingre­di­ent (the sole excep­tion we made is for final fine adjust­ments to sea­son­ings that are highly depen­dent on the indi­vid­ual taste of the cook). People who are learn­ing how to cook and fol­low a recipe accord­ing to vol­ume often end up dis­ap­pointed by fail­ure and can end up los­ing inter­est in cook­ing; that is a ter­ri­ble shame when it happens.

We are hope­ful that more cook­book authors will embrace this phi­los­o­phy. Good scales are cheaper and eas­ier to find than ever, and we hope they find their way into all mod­ern kitchens. You can read all about them on pages 1·94–95 and 4·41 of Modernist Cuisine, and find our rec­om­men­da­tions in our Modernist gear guide.


2 Responses to Tipping the Balance

  1. I would add to the above, that bak­ers use weigh­ing scales as it is not as easy to adjust a dough, where ingre­di­ents need to be added in a par­tic­u­lar order as it is say for a curry where you can adjust almost any ingre­di­ent along the way.

    Living in the trop­ics where the aver­age rel­a­tive humid­ity is above 80%, I would like to add a pro­viso: RH does some­times even mess up the accu­racy of weigh­ing ingre­di­ents, espe­cially for hydro­scopic ingre­di­ents such as flour and sugar — as does cli­matic tem­per­a­ture. For instance, for breads and cakes, since flours absorb more water in humid con­di­tions, some­times the amount of liq­uid to dry ingre­di­ents used needs to be reduced. However, the same holds for its affect on vol­ume measurements.

    Weighing ingre­di­ents is vastly supe­rior and effi­cient, once you get the hang of it. Rose Levy Beranbaum’s clas­sic book, The Cake Bible pub­lished a cou­ple of decades ago was an early American advo­cate of bak­ing by weight rather than vol­ume. Her cook­book was prob­a­bly the first US cook­book to pro­vide recipes in tab­u­lar form giv­ing com­par­a­tive volume/weight (grammes and ounces) along­side each other which helped me make the tran­si­tion as well as to be able to con­vert between the three sys­tems. In addi­tion, it was one of the first books which employed prac­ti­cal and sci­en­tific expla­na­tions for the effects of dif­fer­ent ingre­di­ents on bak­ing outcomes.

    Standardization would be great as when using cook­books from dif­fer­ent coun­tries, each seems to have their own idio­syn­cra­cies which make no sense to out­siders and dif­fer­ent def­i­n­i­tions of what con­sti­tutes a cup, tea­spoon, etc.

    I mea­sure minute quan­ti­ties such as salt or spices by vol­ume or feel as it is more prac­ti­cal, but for larger quan­ti­ties I use the scale. Otherwise, you would need to use two sep­a­rate scales if you want to obtain accu­racy — one to mea­sure minute amounts (eg: capac­ity of under 100g — these are quite expen­sive) in addi­tion to one which can han­dle larger weights such as 5kg or higher.

    Warning — When the sup­posed stan­dard­iza­tion to the met­ric sys­tem came about there were more cook­books which give mea­sure­ments in both met­ric and impe­r­ial weight mea­sure­ments. Sometimes when you check the con­ver­sions, you find that they really do not match. Seems edi­tors some­times for­get to check the math.

  2. I have long used a scale for all of my bak­ing, using a table of weight equiv­a­lents that I put together to trans­late to weight from cups. I’ve always won­dered if humid­ity affects the weight of flour, since so many recipes for bread say that the exact amount of flour will vary eighths amount of water in the flour.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>